Helpful insights on good business practices, commercial loans, alternative forms of financing and planning your company’s future.

New businesses should be ready for Plan B

May 16, 2011

By Cheryl Hall

cherylhall@dallasnews.com

Published 10 May 2011 07:20 PM

Entrepreneurship expert John Mullins warns that having a solid game plan before you launch a business isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be.

Things rarely work out according to plan, so you’d better be prepared to quickly shift gears and move to a Plan B, the London Business School professor says.

“The business-plan-driven culture that’s been built over the past couple of decades in the entrepreneurship world is simply wrong,” says Mullins, who spoke at SMU recently for Engineering & Humanity Week 2011. “If the founders of Google , PayPal or Starbucks had stuck to their original business plans and not made radical changes, they likely wouldn’t be household brands that have delivered huge returns for investors.”

Although Mullins urges caution, his message is also one of encouragement. Yes, your first plan is likely to falter. But if you pay close attention and make quick adjustments as real-world flaws crop up, you might just create that next can’t-live-without product or service.

“Visionaries often try to translate their passion into a business plan — one that typically teeters on a pile of untested assumptions,” Mullins says. “Blindly executing a plan without the benefit of real-life experience straps the visionary into a straightjacket. They ignore the facts in order to try to achieve the plan.”

Outside the lectern

Mullins, who has an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business and a doctorate in marketing from the University of Minnesota, isn’t just a professor speaking from a lectern. He founded two high-growth companies and took one of them public.

The world has plenty of innovators, Mullins says. But true entrepreneurs, those who apply invention in the marketplace and produce significant impact, are in short supply. Innovators have to get smarter about how they bring their innovations to market. Otherwise they squander money, time and entrepreneurial talent.

So ask yourself these questions: Why are you doing this? What problem are you solving? What can you learn from others before you take your first step?

There’s no way to completely sidestep the learning pains of your first plan. Initial assumptions are leaps of faith. And to prove or disprove them you have to, well, leap.

Mullins suggests creating a “dashboard” of measurable results and data. “When those leaps are shown to be lacking by empirical data, the innovator can course-correct before it is too late.”

His book, Getting to Plan B: Breaking Through to a Better Business Model (Harvard Business Press, 2009), co-authored with Randy Komisar, uses case studies to turn abstract concepts into real-life understanding.

For Starbucks, the original concept was to create stores that sold freshly ground coffee by the pound to take home, Mullins says. “Howard Schultz took a vacation in Italy, saw the coffee bar culture there and the rest is history.”

Beyond Plan B

Frankly, Plan B isn’t likely to be your answer either. You might have to work your way down the alphabet.

“Google had no business model at all for Plan A, just a Ph.D. project,” Mullins says. “Plan B was to license their better search technology to the likes of Yahoo , AOL and others, which did not work. Plan C, the idea of paid listings on one side of the page alongside objective search results on the other side [copied from another search company called Overture], was what worked.”

For PayPal, safely exchanging money on the web was Max Levchin’s seventh application for his cryptography skills, Mullins says. “His initial idea, encrypting wireless transmissions from PDAs to wired devices, did not work, nor did plans B through F. Plan G is what worked.”

As for the quintessential transformational company, think of Apple in the early 2000s. “Innovative, yes. Design-conscious, yes. Profitable, no.”

Now think iPodiTunes , iPad, Apple Stores and iTune Apps Stores.

Steve Jobs revolutionized his company and made it the most valuable company in the world in terms of market cap,” Mullins says. “No one has delivered such results by reinventing the company before.”

Mullins’ tips

John Mullins says you can significantly reduce your risk of failure, save years of wasted time and loads of investors’ money if you:

1. Compare your idea with existing businesses to steal what works, avoid what doesn’t and add improvements.

2. Identify “leaps of faith,” the untested questions you are banking your business on.

3. Conduct fast, inexpensive, data-driven experiments to support or refute those questions.

4. Use this data to make smart strategic changes and course-correct before it’s too late.

Allied Affiliated Funding Provides $250,000 Working Capital Facility to Texas Distribution Company

May 10, 2011

Date Funded 5/6/11

Facility Amount:  $250,000

The Company:  This company is a Dallas, TX based wholesale distributor of women’s and children’s accessories. 

The Issue:  This company’s somewhat seasonal business was previously financed for over a decade by another factoring company.  When this factor was ultimately bought out by a bank, this change inadvertently impacted the client relationship and the service levels the company had come to rely on with their long term factor. 

The Solution:  The company sought out a new factoring facility with Allied in hopes of building and maintaining a new, long standing and service-friendly relationship.  The bank referred the client to Eli Gross, and Allied was quickly able to establish a $250,000 working capital facility.  This client returned their signed proposal letter on 4/29 stating they wanted to fund the first week of May.  Allied funded on Friday, 5/6, less than one week from receiving the letter and well within the client’s short requested timeframe.  

The WinThis “Funding by Allied” will provide the company the working capital they need for their business and the quality customer service they were striving to achieve with a new factor and long term financial partner.

Increased Competition Causes Banks to Ease Lending Standards

May 3, 2011

The Fed’s April 2011 senior loan officer opinion survey on bank lending practices indicated that, on net, bank lending standards and terms generally had eased somewhat further during the first quarter of this year, and that the demand for commercial and industrial loans (C&I) and for commercial mortgages increased, while that for residential mortgages continued to decrease. 

The report noted that banks continued to ease standards and terms for C&I loans. The majority of respondents that had eased standards and terms on C&I loans cited increased competition from other banks and non-bank lenders as the most important reason for the easing. Some banks that had eased standards and terms also pointed to a more favorable or less uncertain economic outlook. 

Demand for C&I loans from large and middle-market firms reportedly increased over the past three months. Responses indicating increases in demand for C&I loans from smaller firms were less widespread than for larger firms. 

The survey showed that about 15% of banks reported having eased standards on C&I loans to large and middle-market firms and to small firms in the first quarter, as did 20% of foreign banks. No domestic or foreign banks tightened standards on C&I loans during this period. 

Positive net fractions of banks eased most loan terms on C&I loans for firms of all sizes. Loan spreads were eased by somewhat more respondents than in the previous quarter, with about 55% of domestic banks, on net, narrowing spreads over their cost of funds on loans to large and middle-market firms and 50%, on net, narrowing spreads on loans to small firms. Also, about 50 percent of foreign banks reported an easing of the spreads of loan rates over their own cost of funds. 

Somewhat smaller net fractions of domestic banks lowered the cost of credit lines and reduced the use of interest rate floors (a new loan term added to this survey) in lending to firms of all sizes. On net, about 30% of foreign banks reduced their use of interest rate floors. Moderate net fractions of larger domestic banks and foreign banks eased loan covenants, with several banks adding comments noting the reemergence of syndicated loans with few or no loan covenants. 

The Fed survey is based on responses from 55 domestic banks and 22 U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks. 

To read the full text of the Fed’s senior loan officer opinion survey, click here.

Allied Affiliated Funding
Corporate Headquarters

5151 Beltline Road, Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75254

Tel: 972-776-5300
Fax: 972-404-9955