Helpful insights on good business practices, commercial loans, alternative forms of financing and planning your company’s future.
September 22, 2010

Budget & Tax News > October 2010
Written By: Alyssa Carducci
Published In: Budget & Tax News > October 2010
Publisher: The Heartland Institute
President Obama campaigned on the promise that middle-income earners—those earning $250,000 or less annually—would experience no tax increases. On the upcoming New Year’s Day, however, virtually every American will be facing the possibility of higher taxes.
Lowered tax rates on a wide variety of items including personal income, capital gains, dividends, and estate taxes that became law in 2001 and 2003 are set to expire on January 1 unless Congress extends them.
“Everyone’s tax rates will go up; everyone will see significantly higher taxes,” said Curtis Dubay, a senior policy analyst for the Heritage Foundation. “For the middle class that were promised not to pay tax increases, they’ll certainly see a much smaller paycheck starting in January.”
$1,540 per Family
Nationally, the typical middle-income family, which has a median income of $63,366, would see its federal income tax burden increase by $1,540 if the tax cuts expire, according to an analysis by the Tax Foundation.
“The Democrats are falling all over themselves promising the press and the American people that they will extend certain of the 2001 and 2003 tax relief, patch the AMT, etc. However, there seems to be no solid plans for doing so before the election [in November],” said Ryan Ellis, tax policy director for Americans for Tax Reform.
“In essence, they are asking people to trust that Congress will act after people have had [their only] chance to punish Congress if they don’t,” he said. “There are many of us on the right who believe that they don’t care to extend any of the tax cuts. They need the revenue to fund their permanently higher government spending.”
Business Burdens
American families and individual taxpayers would not be the only ones affected by the tax hike that will result if Congress takes no action. Ellis says both large and small businesses also have no certainty right now.
“If you’re a large employer, the expiration of the tax extenders—particularly the research and experimentation credit—gives you no ability to plan,” he said. “So there’s no sense of stability there,” he said.
He also pointed out many small businesses pay taxes at the rates applied to individuals.
“No one is sure where those rates are going to be, but there’s an increasing sense among business owners that rates are going up in January. There’s also uncertainty about small business expensing and the death tax,” he said.
Hundreds of Billions More
He said the combination of letting the 2001 and 2003 tax relief provisions expire, failing to “patch” the alternative minimum tax, and implementing the ObamaCare tax hikes would raise the nation’s tax burden hundreds of billions of dollars a year.
The alternative minimum tax was created 40 years ago to apply only to a handful of wealthy taxpayers to ensure they would pay a minimum amount of income tax, but it now affects millions of taxpayers because it has never been indexed for inflation. It does away with most deductions and tax credits, forcing people to pay more income tax.
Congress has been “patching” the tax code in recent years to help some people who would otherwise be hit by the AMT avoid its higher taxes.
“The tired old myth that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts were just tax cuts for the rich will finally, once and for all, be proven false,” Dubay said.
Alyssa Carducci (adc.republican@yahoo.com) writes from Florida.
SIDEBAR
If Congress allows the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts to expire, these are major changes that would happen:
- Income tax would increase by 3 to 5 percentage points for every bracket, including an end to the lowest tax bracket, currently 10 percent.
- Capital gains tax rates would rise from 15 percent to 20 percent, and dividends taxes would jump from 15 percent to 39.6 percent.
- The death tax would rise from zero to 55 percent on estates over $1 million.
- The child tax credit would drop from $1000 to $500 per child.
Related Articles: Small Businesses Face Dangerous Tax Hikes Ahead, New Health Care Law Will Have Negative Impact, Unemployment Insurance Kills Small Business, Clients’ Failure to Pay State Franchise Taxes is Risky Business for Factors, Small business lending on the rise, Small business optimism keeps climbing, SBA loans hit record for North Texas , Dallas-area entrepreneurs parlay unexpected growth into new ventures, Five Recovery Steps Business Owners Need to Take Now, Obamacare Packs Crushing New Taxes
Comments: (0)
Tags: Economic Impact, Economy, Small Business, Taxes
September 2, 2010

Experian’s Business Benchmark Report is a monthly view of how U.S. businesses are faring. In July the national average number of days that businesses paid their bills beyond contracted terms increased by 2 percent compared with June. When compared with six months ago, the average payment beyond contracted terms has increased by 3.3 percent. The July report also showed that the national average dollars delinquent and dollars severely delinquent (91 or more days) are up (6 percent and 13 percent, respectively) when compared with six months ago.
Other findings from this month’s Business Benchmark Report include the following:
|

|

|
|
•
|
The average commercial risk score for July was 58.3, up 0.5 percent over June’s average score of 58.0. The score is essentially unchanged when compared with six months ago.
|
|
•
|
Very large businesses and nonemployer businesses have shown the greatest increase in Days Beyond Terms (DBT), increasing by 5.6 percent and 4.0 percent, respectively, when compared with six months ago. Conversely, midsize businesses (with 50 to 499 employees) showed the biggest improvement, reducing DBT by as much as 6.1 percent over the same period.
|
For additional findings, download the full report or view an archive of previous Business Benchmark Reports.
Related Articles: Small business lending on the rise, Small business optimism keeps climbing, SBA loans hit record for North Texas , Dallas-area entrepreneurs parlay unexpected growth into new ventures, Five Recovery Steps Business Owners Need to Take Now, New Health Care Law Will Have Negative Impact, Unemployment Insurance Kills Small Business, Huge Tax Hikes Coming Unless Congress Acts, Take Advantage of 2 New Tax Breaks for Hiring Previously Unemployed People, Small Businesses Face Dangerous Tax Hikes Ahead
Comments: (0)
Tags: Economy, Small Business
June 29, 2010

Source: National Restaurant Association, http://restaurant.org/advocacy/news/hiring/
Employers can take advantage of two new tax incentives for hiring and retaining certain people who haven’t worked in the past 60 days. The benefits are part of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act. President Obama signed the HIRE Act into law March 18. Here’s how you can use the incentives when you hire qualified new employees:
• Get a break from the 6.2 percent payroll tax. Under the HIRE Act, businesses are exempt through year-end from paying their 6.2 percent share of Social Security taxes on qualified employees’ wages. Here’s the fine print:
- The payroll tax exemption applies to qualified employees hired between Feb. 3, 2010, and Jan. 1, 2011. It applies to those employees’ wages from March 19 through Dec. 31, 2010. The tax incentive is capped at $6,622 per employee (6.2 percent of wages up to the maximum taxable Social Security wage base of $106,800).
- Newly hired employees must sign affidavits certifying they hadn’t worked for more than 40 hours in the 60-day period ending on the day they start work. The IRS today released the final version of a sample affidavit, Form W-11, HIRE Act Affidavit.
- Employers claim the exemption when they file their quarterly Form 941, Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return. Employers can begin to claim the exemption on the Form 941 filed for the second quarter of 2010. The IRS has issued a draft revised Form 941 to reflect the new payroll tax incentive.
- The employee continues to pay his or her 6.2 percent share of the Social Security tax, and both employers and employees pay the 1.45 percent Medicare tax on all wages.
- Other restrictions apply. For example, new employees mustn’t be related to the employer. Also, the employer must certify that the new hire isn’t replacing another employee unless that employee separated voluntarily or for cause.
Check the IRS’s HIRE Act: Questions & Answers for Employers for details.
• Get up to $1,000 for retaining those employees. If an employer continues to employ one of the above-described people for at least 52 consecutive weeks, the business also can receive an employee retention credit of up to $1,000.
Businesses claim the credit on their 2011 tax returns. The credit is worth $1,000 or 6.2 percent of an employee’s wages over 52 weeks, whichever is lower.
The employee retention credit follows the rules that apply to all general business credits under Section 38 of the Internal Revenue Code. The only exception is that any excess business credit resulting from the employee retention credit can’t be carried back. It can, however, be carried forward.
Note: Employers who claim the Work Opportunity Tax Credit when they hire certain employees from disadvantaged groups can claim either the HIRE provisions or the WOTC, but not both. Individual companies should compare the tax benefits associated with the WOTC (which offers a maximum annual benefit of $2,400 per worker) and the two HIRE provisions, to determine which provides the better tax benefit.
Related Articles: Unemployment Insurance Kills Small Business, Economic and Financial Developments, Small business lending on the rise, Small business optimism keeps climbing, SBA loans hit record for North Texas , Dallas-area entrepreneurs parlay unexpected growth into new ventures, Five Recovery Steps Business Owners Need to Take Now, New Health Care Law Will Have Negative Impact, Huge Tax Hikes Coming Unless Congress Acts, U.S. Businesses Paying Bills More Slowly
Comments: (0)
Tags: Economic Policies, Economy, Federal Spending, Small Business
March 17, 2010

The economy grew at a rapid 6% annual rate in the fourth quarter of last year. For many, news of rapid growth appears inconsistent with widespread job losses, high unemployment rates and widespread bank failures. Much of the inconsistency stems from the difference between the level of business activity and its change. Changes from very depressed to not quite as depressed may impress economists and statisticians. They don’t impress those struggling to deal with current economic conditions.
There has clearly been some improvement in the business climate. Nationwide, housing prices are up about 5% from their lows last spring. However, prices remain 30% off their highs. The collapse in home prices has left a quarter of all mortgage holders with negative equity in their homes. Negative equity has meant significant loan losses for banks. In addition to the equity decline in their homes, many homeowners face a challenging job market. In spite of the improvement in business activity and increased orders for new business, layoffs continue and companies are reluctant to rehire workers.
Read the rest of this entry »
Related Articles: Economic and Financial Developments, New Health Care Law Will Have Negative Impact, Factoring Holds Strong as Study Shows Small Business Lending Is Unchanged , Small business lending on the rise, Why are small business owners feeling so good?, Allied Affiliated Funding Provides $500,000 in Working Capital to Northeast Manufacturer, Small business optimism keeps climbing, SBA loans hit record for North Texas , More Small Businesses Are Selling Receivables at a Loss, Dallas-area entrepreneurs parlay unexpected growth into new ventures
Comments: (0)
Tags: Economic, Economy, Financial, Financial Spending, Job Loss, Recession
February 5, 2010

There were monumental changes in both the economy and economic policies this past year. While business activity continued to decline during the first half of the year, by mid-year the economy began to grow.
Some attribute the turnaround in the economy to an unprecedented 18% increase in federal government spending. However, in spite of much talk about government stimulus, increases in federal spending tend to be associated with economic weakness rather than strength.
Some economists believe that government spending can boost total spending. This view first emerged during the 1930s when total spending collapsed and prices were falling. Few associated the collapse in spending with the Federal Reserve’s monetary restraint. Desperate to restore spending, politicians and economists reasoned that if government increased its spending then total spending would also increase. The problem with this line of reasoning is that the federal government cannot spend money without first taking it from someone else.
Read the rest of this entry »
Related Articles: Unemployment Insurance Kills Small Business, ObamaCare: the Burden on Small Business, Take Advantage of 2 New Tax Breaks for Hiring Previously Unemployed People, Economic and Financial Developments, New Health Care Law Will Have Negative Impact, The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of the Tax Deal, What Is Fed’s QE2, and What Will It Do? Experts Explain in Everyday English., Economy 101: Who benefits from new banking rules?, Small business lending on the rise, Why are small business owners feeling so good?
Comments: (0)
Tags: Economic, Economic Policies, Economy, Federal Spending, Financial Spending, Government
February 1, 2010

Author: Michael Hosemann, Managing Director, Enterprise Consulting Solutions
In the “brave new world” following the November 2008 elections, small businesses face a phalanx of challenges in the tax arena. First of all, the Obama Administration and Democrats in Congress plan to allow some of the Bush-era tax cuts to expire, thus raising taxes on top earners. Secondly, the health care overhaul being debated in Congress contains proposals that pose a huge financial threat to small businesses. Finally, the Cap and Trade legislation that awaits debate in Congress proposes an energy tax in disguise that promises to artificially explode the cost of energy and, therefore, the cost of overhead in small businesses.
Read the rest of this entry »
Related Articles: Huge Tax Hikes Coming Unless Congress Acts, New Health Care Law Will Have Negative Impact, Unemployment Insurance Kills Small Business, Clients’ Failure to Pay State Franchise Taxes is Risky Business for Factors, Small business lending on the rise, Small business optimism keeps climbing, SBA loans hit record for North Texas , Dallas-area entrepreneurs parlay unexpected growth into new ventures, Five Recovery Steps Business Owners Need to Take Now, Obamacare Packs Crushing New Taxes
Comments: (2)
Tags: Economic Impact, Economy, Small Business, Tax Cuts, Taxes
|